Trending News
Spin4Play
Bovegas Casino - Bonus up to $5500 - Claim now
Political social media posts may be subject to censorship. Here's everything to know about the U.S. Senate hearing on the matter.

Is social media censored? Everything about the U.S. Senate hearing

In the last twenty years, social media has come to dominate our daily lives. We use it as a source of entertainment, to keep up with friends and family, and to get the most crucial information of the day. News outlets have used Facebook & Twitter to reach millions of people, and in an election year, the number of posts skyrockets. 

There seem to be more social media posts about U.S. political candidates compared to previous election years. Everything from fact to fiction is spread through websites and onto social media for U.S. citizens to consume – and confirm their confirmation biases.  

This past week, U.S. senators on the Commerce Committee grilled Facebook, Twitter, and Google’s CEOs about their companies’ content moderation policies. Some senators expressed a need for more transparency in moderation decisions, while others wanted clarity on specific cases. As you can imagine, opinions on the hearing were drawn along party lines: many Democrats were against and Republicans for the hearings. 

Is your content censored? 

According to the CEOs on the hot seat, major social media companies are not censoring your personal social media content. (So you can keep posting photos of your burritos on Instagram without fear of them taking it down.) Public accounts like those of politicians & news outlets are getting censored by Facebook & Twitter; they claim this is to curb the spread of what they deem misinformation & fake news.

Laws to keep in mind

Senators called the hearing to discuss Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which gives social media companies like Facebook & Twitter legal protections in defamation cases.

Section 230 provides social media companies these protections in two ways: first via separating companies from their user-generated content. This means Twitter is not on the hook if a user’s post defames public figures, etc. The second protection is through allowing the companies to moderate their content how they see fit. 

Senators are at odds with the second part of Section 230. Many Republican Senators on the committee claimed Facebook & Twitter’s content moderation policies go beyond this 230 protection. According to Chairman Roger Wicker, the companies’ content moderation policies create “an apparent double standard that disadvantages conservative content on social media.”   

What politicians are saying

Republicans claim Facebook & Twitter have a liberal bias. Senator Ted Cruz went after Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey for restricting content from the New York Post about former Vice President Joe Biden & his son, Hunter. 

Republicans also had issues with Twitter flagging President Trump’s controversial (but never violent) tweets while allowing Supreme Leader of Iran Ayatollah Ali Khamenei’s clear calls for violence to go uncensored. 

Twitter’s response as to why they didn’t censor Khamenei was because they labeled his tweet as “saber-rattling” and commenting on foreign affairs. In other words, Twitter did not view it as a legitimate threat. The company flagged Trump’s tweets of direct threats of military force for cities that failed to get George Floyd & Black Lives Matter protests under control. 

Cruz admonished Dorsey for this explanation: “Who the hell elected you and put you in charge of what the media are allowed to report and what the American people are allowed to hear, and why do you persist in behaving as a Democratic super PAC silencing views to the contrary of your political beliefs?”

Social media CEOs’ response

Jack Dorsey was directly asked – twice – if in his opinion Twitter directly affected the outcome of elections, to which he replied “No.” Dorsey added Twitter to the “spectrum of channels people have” to access information and expressed his desire to expand the reaches of Section 230 to better police social media companies like Twitter. 

Dorsey proposed “companies [providing clearer] explanations of their content moderation decisions, a ‘straightforward’ appeals process, and the ability for consumers to choose the algorithms that serve up social media content.” Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg & Google CEO Sundar Pichai echoed Dorsey’s sentiment in their remarks as well.

Does the data support Republicans? 

No independent study has as of yet supported Republican claims that social media is biased against conservative posts. Some studies go as far as to say that the contrary is true and that Facebook is a right-wing echo chamber. Critics of these studies point to left-wing funding sources such as university thinktanks.  

New York Times columnist Kevin Roose tweets out Facebook’s top five posts of the day based on engagement and found most of them are from right-wing outlets like Fox News, Ben Shapiro, and Brietbart, the later is more likely to spread misinformation, fake news, and conspiracy theories. (Engagement measures how often a post is shared, liked, or actions taken like clicking on a link.)

Facebook’s head of News Feed John Hegeman claims engagement only tells half the story. Hegeman explained when the metric was adjusted to show reach instead of engagement, mainstream sources like MSNBC, NBC News, and ABC News come across users’ feeds more frequently.

Share via:
No Comments

Leave a Comment