Trending News
Argo Casino - Game of Thrones - 20 Free Spins
Golden Reels
The criminal law is supposed to help bring justice to those who do wrong. But what if the wrong person ends up behind bars? It happens more than you think.

It’s criminal: All the times the law locked up the innocent

Truth and justice are what make up the criminal justice system, right? Not exactly. Unfortunately, whether it’s due to personal bias, a lack of resources, or just cluelessness, but there’s been cases when the criminal law system locked up innocent people for heinous crimes. 

Worse, some people pay the ultimate price, facing the death penalty for a crime they weren’t resposnible for. The truth is, even with all the education in the world, there’s still room for error, leading to the wrong person being charged. 

These cases highlight the flaws in the justice system, failing to properly protect the innocent and charge the guilty. It takes more than just being in the wrong place at the wrong time to get charged with a murder

The criminal law is supposed to help bring justice to those who do wrong. But what if the wrong person ends up behind bars? It happens more than you think.

Joe Arridy 

Sentenced to death for the rape and murder of 15 year old Colorado girl, it was later revealed that Arridy most likely wasn’t even in the town of Pueblo the day the crime happened. But because of Arridy’s severe mental disability, he never truly understood why he was being arrested. A true misuse of criminal law, if we say so. 

Even on death row, he just played with trains, unaware his final days were approaching. On January 6th, 1939, Arridy was executed for her murder. 72 years later, he was pardoned. Even if he played some role in the crime, it’s clear he most likely had no clue what was going on, thanks to his mental disability. But more likely than not, Arridy was completely innocent. 

The criminal law is supposed to help bring justice to those who do wrong. But what if the wrong person ends up behind bars? It happens more than you think.

Rubin “Hurricane” Carter

There were plenty of times back in the 60’s where colored people were automatically discriminated against by police thanks to segregation. But you wouldn’t expect that out of a northern state would you? Yet boxed Rubin Carter and another black man John Artis were incorrectly identified as the assailants in a triple homicide in New Jersey. 

The state managed to “come up” with two witnesses who testified against Carter and Artis, even after both men were released when their alibis checked out. Both men were given three life sentences. They were given a retrial in 1976, but their conviction remained the same. It took nearly 20 years after they were arrested for a judge to set them free, saying they didn’t have fair trials. 

James Jones Richardson

Accused of murdering his seven children after all of them died from a tainted meal, Richardson was initially given the death penalty. What made him the prime suspect was a recent inquiry into life insurance for his children. Reduced to 25 years to life in prison, inmates said that Richardson confided in them that he killed his children and was actually guilty. 

22 years later, a part-time babysitter for the Richardson family, Bessie Reese, confessed to the crime. At the time of the murder, Reese was on parole for killing her second husband, and she most likely killed her first husband the same way she killed the Richardson children. Richardson was finally freed in 1989, 24 years after being tried.

The criminal law is supposed to help bring justice to those who do wrong. But what if the wrong person ends up behind bars? It happens more than you think.

Tim Masters

A 15 year old sees a dead body in the park while on the way to school, but assumes it’s just a mannequin and moves on with his day. That mistake cost Masters his freedom, as combined with his mother’s death four years prior, his knife collection, and his violent art collection left him the prime suspect in the murder of Peggy Hettrick. 

Given life in prison starting in 1998, Masters was exonerated ten years later once DNA evidence initially looked over proved someone else was responsible for Hettrick’s death. While Hettrick’s murder has yet to have been solved, police are looking for a new lead, no longer focused on Masters.

George Stinney

A 14 year old boy sentenced to death? It sounds like a horror movie, but in 1944, this gross misuse of the criminal law left Stinney dead for a crime he had nothing to do with. When two girls in South Carolina turned up dead, Stinney is suspect number one as he and his sister were the last two to see the girls alive. 

Once arrested, Stinney never saw his parents again, and was coerced into giving a confession by police. The all-white jury took 10 minutes to decide that Stinney was guilty, demanding the judge give him the death penalty. 

To this day, Stinney is the only person under 18 to be executed under the death penalty. It took until 2014 for someone to exonerate Stinney, sharing how he was not given a fair trial, and his confession was coerced by police. 

If you’re part of the true crime community, sign up for our newsletter. We promise plenty of relevant news, polls, quizzes, and articles in your inbox. 

 

Share via:
Comments
  • Anyone who thinks for a while about a wrongly executed person cannot possibly continue to support the death penalty.

    Imagine the pain and confusion over being wrongly charged in the first place, then wrongly convicted of a terrible crime you didn’t commit, Then consider how you’d feel as each appeal failed, every day behind bars tearing your heart and soul to pieces, as well as your friends‘ and family’s. A sentence of life in prison would be bad enough, but not nearly the nauseating nightmare of capital punishment, anticipating your own extermination at the cold, calculating, inescapable hand of the State.

    For the guilty, death is hardly a punishment—someone truly guilty of killing another human being should have to think about that unforgivable act every day for as long as possible. Death by execution then actually shortens that punishment! And if the condemned is innocent, their death makes us the worst criminal of all—executioners of terrified innocents by remote assent—we become, truly, the unforgiven.

    May 27, 2020

Leave a Comment