California election law expert Kaufman explains delayed results
Polls in California closed on November 3, 2026, yet final results may not be known for weeks due to mail voting rules and certification timelines. Stephen J. Kaufman, founder and principal of Kaufman Legal Group, is positioned to assist journalists in understanding these delays and the associated procedures. Most votes arrive by mail, with postmarked ballots accepted if received within seven days. Counties must complete certification by December 3 under state law, during which leads may change and races stay undecided, often leading to inquiries about the integrity and mechanics involved.
With three decades of experience in election law, Kaufman established his firm, Kaufman Legal Group, which marks its 30th year. He previously chaired the California Voting Modernization Board, directing significant improvements to voting technology across the state. Additionally, he participated in the Los Angeles Municipal Elections Reform Commission. Kaufman served as a recount attorney in the aftermath of the 2000 Florida presidential election and received appointment in 2001 as Chief Counsel for the U.S. House Democratic Caucus Special Committee on Election Reform. The firm has managed various recounts and related court cases at both state and federal levels.
Particular significance attaches to the 2026 California elections. These represent the initial general election conducted under congressional district maps approved via Proposition 50 in November 2025, following allowance by federal judges for use that year. Electors also chose a successor governor and voted on multiple statewide propositions. A number of House of Representatives contests drew close attention and could require extended periods before official calls.
Kaufman commented on the extended timeline, noting its purpose. “Election night gives us a first look, not a final answer,” he said. “California’s process is designed to ensure that every valid ballot is counted, and that takes time. It is important that people understand what is happening at each stage, and what the law allows when someone questions the results.” This perspective underscores the priority on complete and accurate tabulation over rapid announcements.
Distinct areas where Kaufman offers insights include explanations for the prolonged counting duration in California and reassurance that shifting leads after initial tallies represent standard occurrences rather than causes for concern. He stands prepared to interpret the results' implications for important contests, propositions, and the debut use of redrawn districts from Proposition 50. Regarding narrow victories, he can outline who qualifies to seek recounts, financial responsibilities involved, and the limited extent to which such processes usually alter certified numbers. Handling of ballots requiring signature verification fixes and those cast provisionally forms another topic, as does the full certification sequence involving county boards and the Secretary of State, including responses to attempts at postponement. Legal constraints prevent excessive federal agency or court interference once voting concludes. Post-election challenges proceed through established state and federal judicial channels. He distinguishes between baseless fraud accusations and those backed by concrete evidence. Post-election finance reports reveal spending patterns and remaining obligations. Finally, patterns from 2026 may inform preparations and regulations heading into 2028.
Interviews with Kaufman can be arranged through the period leading to final certification of results. Sessions are offered live or recorded, for on-camera or background use, either in person at his Los Angeles office or via remote connection.
